A prompt from Anthropic's Claude use-case library for when you have read many papers and lost track of how they relate. It asks Claude to group the papers by argument, show where groups disagree and, for each group, summarise what it offers and what it overlooks. Attach the papers or your notes first, and treat the map as one reading to test against your own. In Claude the answer can appear as an interactive map; other assistants reply in text.
I've read 20 papers on AI in K-12 and I've lost the thread. Can you map out who's actually agreeing with who and where the real disagreements are? I can't tell anymore which papers are building on each other and which are talking past each other. If I click into a group, give me the short version of what they've got and what they're missing.
Analyze a research paper's findings and rigorThis prompt reads a research paper and returns a structured review with a summary, authors and organizations, key findings, and a study overview. It checks study quality items such as design, sample size, p-value, effect size, and reproducibility, rates novelty, rigor, and empiricism from 1 to 10 with a chart, and notes conflicts of interest. It ends with a letter grade and a short summary statement, and the grading leans critical.Research
Break down an earnings callThis prompt breaks down the transcript of a quarterly results call or investor conference for equity research. It pulls out what management said, the analyst questions, financial and operating signals, warning signs, and less obvious hints, then writes an executive summary in bullets.Research
Explain a bill or law, including what it plays downThis prompt summarizes a proposed bill or an existing law, lists the changes it would make, and contrasts how its backers present it with a balanced reading. It also points out parts that may get less attention, such as fees, loopholes, or cut programs, and their likely effects.Research
Extract ideas, insights, and quotes from long textThis prompt reads a transcript or long text and pulls out a summary, facts, habits, quotes, insights, and ideas, plus references, a one-sentence takeaway, and recommendations. It looks for what is surprising or interesting, especially on topics such as technology, learning, and human flourishing. Bullets are held to a fixed length, and the output is Markdown bullets with no warnings or notes.Research
Fallacy Finder for an ArgumentIdentify logical fallacies and provide fairer restatements for an argumentative text.Research
