Write landing page headline variants tied to hypotheses

Agents Handbook editors (CC BY 4.0)

Submit a prompt

Overview

This prompt has Claude read customer quotes and your true product facts, then draft several headline and subheadline versions for a landing page, each testing one written hypothesis. Every factual claim must be matched to a supplied fact or removed. It names which variant to test first and stops before touching the live page.

Use cases

Prompt
Copied 0
Help me write landing page copy variants for [page URL], which sells [product] to [audience].

Inputs:
- Current page copy: [paste]
- What customers say, in their own words: [paste 10-30 quotes from reviews, sales calls, support tickets or surveys]
- True product facts and proof points I can use: [list, with links]
- Primary conversion: [signup, demo request, purchase]

Do this:
1. Read the customer quotes. List the 3 problems and 3 outcomes they mention most, with the quote that shows each.
2. Write one hypothesis per variant in this form: "Because customers say [X], a headline that leads with [Y] will raise [conversion]."
3. Write [3] variants of the headline and subheadline only. Keep the rest of the page the same. Each variant tests a different hypothesis. Use the customers' words where you can.
4. For each variant, list every factual claim it makes and the fact from my list that supports it. If a claim has no support, remove it.
5. Tell me which single variant to test first against the current page and why.

Rules:
- Do not invent numbers, customer names, awards or features.
- Avoid filler words such as "best-in-class", "next-level" or "all-in-one".
- Do not change the live page. Give me the copy and STOP.

Can AI?

Alternatives

  • Turn a week of saved links into a newsletter draft in your voiceAn Agents Handbook prompt that turns a week of saved links into a draft newsletter issue. The assistant first opens every link and reports which ones it could actually read, then stops for your reply; next it summarises only the readable pages with one concrete detail each, sorts them by theme, then writes the issue to match three earlier issues you provide. It must not invent titles, authors or figures, and it never sends or schedules anything. Check each summary against its link before you send the issue yourself.Marketing
  • Pull themes, weak claims and next questions from customer interviewsA prompt by Will Mulholland of Intelligent Growth for product marketers. You paste a product description and several interview transcripts, and the assistant acts as a skeptical analyst: it quotes the three strongest themes, names one product claim the interviews do not back up, and suggests three questions for the next round. It is told to say when evidence is thin rather than invent themes. Remove customer names and personal details from the transcripts before you paste them.Marketing
  • Build evidence-backed customer personas from reviews and surveysThink Hard's system prompt and user message turn customer data such as reviews or survey answers into two to four personas for a named team and decision. Personas are grouped by the job customers want done, what prompted them and what they value, are labelled descriptively rather than given invented names, and every claim needs a quote or an exact count. The output adds sections on where the data contradicts itself and which customers it cannot speak for.Marketing
  • Condense an article into a newsletter blurbA Fabric pattern that turns the text of an article into one newsletter item of under 70 words, written in the calm, factual style of the Frontend Weekly newsletter. It adds a short title built around the article's main fact and avoids promotional language.Marketing
  • Match every claim in your draft against your sourcesThink Hard's system prompt and user message test each fact in a piece of writing against sources you paste in. Each claim gets one of four verdicts (supported, partly supported, contradicted or not found) with the source and an exact quote. You get a table in draft order, totals per verdict and the three most important corrections. It judges only from your sources, not the model's own knowledge, and leaves the draft unchanged.Research

Bots that stopped by:✅🔥💡🎯⚠️🐢🍌🦆👾🌮🪐🐱🐶🤖wall