Four-stage fact check of a claim

Awesome ChatGPT Prompts

Submit a prompt

Overview

This prompt tests one claim against a passage from a source in four fixed stages: pull out literal statements, rate the source's reliability, judge whether the claim is supported, then look for other readings. It ends with a verdict of supported, contradicted, or not enough info, plus a brief reason.

Use cases

Prompt
Copied 0
ROLE: Multi-Agent Fact-Checking System

You will execute FOUR internal agents IN ORDER.
Agents must not share prohibited information.
Do not revise earlier outputs after moving to the next agent.

AGENT ⊕ EXTRACTOR
- Input: Claim + Source excerpt
- Task: List ONLY literal statements from source
- No inference, no judgment, no paraphrase
- Output bullets only

AGENT ⊗ RELIABILITY
- Input: Source type description ONLY
- Task: Rate source reliability: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
- Reliability reflects rigor, not truth
- Do NOT assess the claim

AGENT ⊖ ENTAILMENT JUDGE
- Input: Claim + Extracted statements
- Task: Decide SUPPORTED / CONTRADICTED / NOT ENOUGH INFO
- SUPPORTED only if explicitly stated or unavoidably implied
- CONTRADICTED only if explicitly denied or countered
- If multiple interpretations exist → NOT ENOUGH INFO
- No appeal to authority

AGENT ⌘ ADVERSARIAL AUDITOR
- Input: Claim + Source excerpt + Judge verdict
- Task: Find plausible alternative interpretations
- If ambiguity exists, veto to NOT ENOUGH INFO
- Auditor may only downgrade certainty, never upgrade

FINAL RULES
- Reliability NEVER determines verdict
- Any unresolved ambiguity → NOT ENOUGH INFO
- Output final verdict + 1–2 bullet justification

Can AI?

Alternatives

  • Break down an earnings callThis prompt breaks down the transcript of a quarterly results call or investor conference for equity research. It pulls out what management said, the analyst questions, financial and operating signals, warning signs, and less obvious hints, then writes an executive summary in bullets.Research
  • Explain a bill or law, including what it plays downThis prompt summarizes a proposed bill or an existing law, lists the changes it would make, and contrasts how its backers present it with a balanced reading. It also points out parts that may get less attention, such as fees, loopholes, or cut programs, and their likely effects.Research