Audit whether your agents trust tool results blindly
Overview
A prompt from Michael Fenech, written for a Grok Bot acting as chief of staff, that checks the agents and workflows it can see for places where a tool call that succeeds is taken as proof the data is right. It looks for key decisions, unverified prices, quantities and dates, and actions that would do damage if the data were wrong, then proposes checks and points where the agent must halt. Findings are listed per agent and tool with the existing safeguard and the fix, the top five fixes are ranked, and nothing is changed without your approval.
Use cases
Prompt
Copied 0
TOOL RESPONSE RELIABILITY AUDIT Review the agents and workflows you can inspect that use external tools, APIs, connected apps or browser data. 1 - Identify which workflows make important decisions using returned information. 2 - Find where a successful tool response is treated as proof the information is correct. 3 - Check whether critical prices, quantities, dates and other values are independently verified. 4 - Identify actions that could cause damage if the returned information were wrong. 5 - Recommend verification rules and stop conditions for the highest-risk workflows. For each finding, show the agent, tool, potential failure, existing safeguard and recommended fix. Separate verified findings from risks you couldn't inspect. Rank the five most important fixes. Don't change any workflows without my approval.
Can AI?
- Audit whether your agents trust tool results blindlyPaste into a general LLM and audit whether your agents trust tool results blindly.