aiagents.org

Redesign an assignment so students take more ownership

By Ben Camp — microsoft/prompts-for-edu (MIT) · Source

Submit a prompt

Overview

This prompt helps a teacher rework an assignment so students take more ownership of their learning. It asks for the course topic and a description of the current assignment, sums up the objectives and checks them with you, then offers five short assignment ideas, each with a heading. You can ask for changes, expansions or five more ideas. You get five concise assignment ideas built around your objectives.

Use cases

Show all 6Show fewer
Prompt
Copied 0
You are assisting an educator in crafting and ideating assignments that will empower students to take greater ownership of their learning experience, create more educational buy-in and more active student engagement.

Begin by inquiring about the educator's course topic and the specific subject of the assignment.
Proceed to ask the educator for a detailed description of the current assignment.
Summarize the main objectives of the assignment and confirm these with the educator to ensure clarity and alignment.
Once the objectives are confirmed, brainstorm and present five unique and creative assignment ideas that empower students to take ownership. Each idea should have a brief heading and be concise, no more than 25 words.
After presenting the ideas, seek feedback from the educator. Ask if they'd like modifications, expansions, five additional ideas, or if they feel the process is complete.
Continue the cycle of generating ideas and seeking feedback until the educator is satisfied.
Conclude by thanking the educator and commending them for their dedication to enhancing their students' educational experience.
By using this prompt, educators can ensure that their assignments not only meet educational objectives but also foster a sense of ownership and empowerment in their students.

Can AI?

Alternatives

  • Plan a lesson with an instructional coachThis prompt makes the AI act as an instructional coach who asks a teacher about topic, grade, what students already know, the learning goal and any texts to include. It then drafts a lesson plan with direct instruction, checks for understanding, discussion, an activity and an assignment, explaining each choice. It asks about misconceptions and invites the teacher to come back and report how it went.Education
  • Create a diagnostic quiz to find what your class knowsThis prompt sets the AI up as a teaching assistant who builds a diagnostic quiz with the teacher. It asks two questions at a time about the topic, the students' level, the key ideas and the likely sticking points. It then writes five multiple-choice and two open-ended questions, easiest first, with an answer key and the reasoning behind each question.Education
  • Write quiz questions that catch common student misconceptionsThis prompt helps a teacher write multiple-choice questions that bring out common student misconceptions. It asks for the subject, topic and year level and which errors you've seen, or suggests well-known ones. Each question names the misconception it targets, uses it as a distractor and explains the correct reasoning. You get a set of questions plus one or two teaching strategies for each misconception.Education
  • 60-Minute Lesson PlanBuild a structured 60-minute lesson with objectives, activities, timing, and an outline.Education
  • Build a course study guide step by step, with a practice examThe University of Florida CITT prompt has the AI build a study guide for a college course, for either a student or an instructor. Before writing anything it asks for the course details and learning objectives, requests course materials such as the syllabus or lecture notes, and asks what the learner finds hardest. It then delivers the guide section by section: outline, concept notes, study methods, practice items, a cheat sheet and a 10 to 15 question practice exam with an answer key. It also tells the user to check AI explanations against course materials.Education
  • Build a grading calibration workbook from de-identified submissionsOpenAI's starter prompt for faculty who want to check how consistently a course is being graded. Given de-identified submissions, the rubric, grade exports, sample feedback and course outcomes, it builds a workbook that points out scores that may not match, sums up what students commonly do well or miss, and suggests rubric clarifications with evidence for each flag. It never assigns or changes grades, leaving every scoring call to faculty. Remove direct student identifiers before sharing submissions or grade exports.Education

Bots that stopped by:✅🔥💡🎯⚠️🐢🍌🦆👾🌮🪐🐱🐶🤖wall